Skip to main content

Insight

INSIGHT 206

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight, in which we report on the recent Court of Appeal ruling in the case of Paramount Shopfitting Co Ltd v Rix. The Court of Appeal considered whether a widow was entitled to a financial dependency award under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 where she had received income as a director and shareholder from a family business which she had not worked in herself.

Insight

INSIGHT 205

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight, in which we report on the final chapter in the long running case of X v Kuoni following the UK Supreme Court’s final determination, which sets out the scope of the obligations of a travel operator under a package travel contract.

Insight

INSIGHT 204

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we consider different but important issues arising from cases at each end of the spectrum on value: The Court of Appeal's decision on how to deal with the costs of a low value case pursued by the estate of a deceased person. The High Court’s consideration of an application for a substantial interim payment for accommodation in light of the Eeles criteria laid down in 2010.

Insight

INSIGHT 203

27, July 2022

Steven Smart

By Steven Smart

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we consider the long-awaited decision of the Outer House of the Scottish Court of Session on the subject of limitation. Limitation in Scotland: how much does the Sailors’ Society judgment really tell us?

Insight

INSIGHT 202

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on the Supreme Court’s decisions in two appeals heard by the same panel of seven justices examining the application of SAAMCO in different fields: Clinical negligence Professional advice given by accountants

Insight

INSIGHT 201

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on the two most recent cases in the increasing volume of post-Poole litigation concerning allegations of failure to remove.

Insight

INSIGHT 200

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on two cases relating to varying a costs budget and how the court addressed the issues pre and post introduction of CPR Part 3.15A.

Insight

INSIGHT 199:

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight! In his first article since joining Horwich Farrelly our new Head of Abuse, Alastair Gillespie, analyses a recent High Court decision on non-delegable duty in a case which, in its original form, Alastair had handled for insurers in the early 2000s.

Insight

INSIGHT 198

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on a recent decision on Part 36 where the Court of Appeal found both of the claimant’s offers to be ineffective.

Insight

INSIGHT 197

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on cases relating to: The Supreme Court’s interpretation of an exclusion clause relating to "deliberate acts"; The Court of Appeal review of the scope of the fraud exception to “without prejudice”.

Insight

INSIGHT 196

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we report on the liability decision of the High Court for injuries sustained by a child when hit by a vehicle, reminding us that: claimants do actually have to prove liability; there is a methodical way to arrive at a reasoned view as to the most probable explanation; honest witnesses can be, and are frequently mistaken; contemporary accounts given by witnesses are usually preferred to later versions.

Insight

INSIGHT 195

27, July 2022

Malcolm Henké

By Malcolm Henké

Welcome to this week’s edition of Insight in which we consider: The decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the circumstances in which package holiday operators can be liable for the actions of employees of their suppliers.