In the recent Liverpool County Court decision of Nagorski v Nikolics and Tradewise Insurance, the court had to determine RTA liability where the first defendant was uninsured, but the vehicle he was driving was shown on MID as being insured on a Motor Trader policy.
The insurer is on MID, so they must be the RTA insurer, right?
In the recent Liverpool County Court decision of Nagorski v Nikolics and Tradewise Insurance, the court had to determine RTA liability where the first defendant was uninsured, but the vehicle he was driving was shown on MID as being insured on a Motor Trader policy.
The scenario presented by this case is far from being a one-off and further highlights the need for a solution.
Click here to read more.
You may also like
Supreme Court Decision on Mixed Injuries
The Claims Industry is at a Pivotal Moment The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the whiplash ‘mixed injury’...
Update to Ireland’s Occupiers’ Liability Law
For almost 30 years, the Occupiers’ Liability Act, 1995 (“the 1995 Act”) has represented the settled statutory position in Ireland...
Housing Disrepair claims insulated for another two years
Despite the suggestion in 2022 that housing cases may be part of the extension to fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime,...
Mixed Injury Claims – The Discussion Continues
Over 400 attendees joined a live broadcast of our HFTV roundtable event focused on the Court of Appeal mixed injury...
